Re: Question about contrib - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Question about contrib
Date
Msg-id 207335.1618839627@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Question about contrib  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
List pgsql-general
Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> writes:
> Le lun. 19 avr. 2021 à 10:43, Condor <condor@stz-bg.com> a écrit :
>> Aha my mistake, sorry. Why is not in main tree then ?

> Because they aren't interesting for everyone. Moreover, some are more dev
> tools, than DBA tools. So better to pick the tools you need.

Actually I think the high-level answer is that the contrib modules
exist to verify that Postgres is extensible, and to provide sample
code for other people wanting to make extensions.  It's great that
they have actual use cases, but we'd keep them even if they didn't.

While they're all nominally supported, some are old, crufty, and
deprecated to various extents.  xml2, in particular, might go away
someday.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mohan Radhakrishnan
Date:
Subject: Re: Storing state machine
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: could not read from hash-join temporary file: SUCCESS && DB goes into recovery mode