Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum
Date
Msg-id 20723.1166768107@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Interface for pg_autovacuum  ("Jim Nasby" <jim.nasby@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Jim Nasby" <jim.nasby@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> The only other thought that comes to mind is that such syntax will  
> make it a *lot* more verbose to set all the options for a table.

Which should surely make you wonder whether setting these options
per-table is the most important thing to do...

Arguing about syntax details is pretty premature, in my humble opinion.
We don't have agreement yet about what options we need or what scope
they should apply over.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Takayuki Tsunakawa"
Date:
Subject: Re: Load distributed checkpoint
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Load distributed checkpoint