Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
Date
Msg-id 20701.1181244454@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately  ("Andrew Hammond" <andrew.george.hammond@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Andrew Hammond" <andrew.george.hammond@gmail.com> writes:
> Hmmm... it seems to me that points new users towards not using
> autovacuum, which doesn't seem like the best idea. I think it'd be
> better to say that setting the naptime really high is a Bad Idea.

It seems like we should have an upper limit on the GUC variable that's
less than INT_MAX ;-).  Would an hour be sane?  10 minutes?

This is independent of the problem at hand, though, which is that we
probably want the launcher to notice postmaster death in less time
than autovacuum_naptime, for reasonable values of same.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: pqlib suggestion
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Controlling Load Distributed Checkpoints