Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes:
> If it for pgmonitor then you guys ought to just mark it broken on
> these platforms, the non-"ps based" solution could have been
> implemented with all the time wasted trying to get the "ps based"
> hack working. :(
My thoughts exactly ;-) ... I'm willing to give advice about this,
but not to do any legwork myself.
PS status display does have some utility with or without pgmonitor,
but not enough to do a lot of work for.
regards, tom lane
