Mark Dilger <markdilger@yahoo.com> writes:
> Would it make sense for this to just be part of 'make check'?
Probably not, as (I imagine) it will take quite a bit longer than
"make check" does today. People who are not working on replication
related features will be annoyed if a test cycle starts taking 10X
longer than it used to, for tests of no value to them.
It's already not the case that "make check" runs every available
automated test; the isolation tests, the PL tests, the contrib
tests are all separate.
There is a make check-world, which I think should reasonably run
all of these.
regards, tom lane
