Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables
Date
Msg-id 20518.1056595068@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> ISTM that "source" is worth knowing.

Hm, possibly.  Any other opinions?

>> This reminds me, someone (Barry?) was griping that SHOW DATESTYLE
>> doesn't produce a value that SET DATESTYLE will take.  Did we agree
>> that it was OK to change the output to look like "ISO, US" etc?

> I vaguely remember the thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00190.php

> I don't see any followup (agreements or disagreements). Do you want me
> to change that while I'm at it?

No, I can handle it (and it should be a separate commit anyway).

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ecpg fix
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables