Re: meson vs tarballs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: meson vs tarballs
Date
Msg-id 2047141.1710340924@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: meson vs tarballs  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 13.03.24 07:42, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 2024-03-13 We 02:31, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>> Alternatively, PostgreSQL can be built using Meson. This is currently 
>>>> experimental and only works when building from a Git checkout (not 
>>>> from a distribution tarball).

>> Ah!. Darn, I missed that. Thanks.
>> Of course, when release 17 comes out this had better not be the case, 
>> since we have removed the custom Windows build system.

> Yes, this has been changed in 17.

My understanding is that pretty soon there will be no difference,
ie distribution tarballs will have the same contents as a git pull
(less the .git infrastructure).  If we're planning on making that
happen for 17, perhaps we'd better get on with it.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE ... WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions