Re: small exclusion constraints patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: small exclusion constraints patch
Date
Msg-id 2047.1279241182@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to small exclusion constraints patch  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> Currently, the check for exclusion constraints performs a sanity check
> that's slightly too strict -- it assumes that a tuple will conflict with
> itself. That is not always the case: the operator might be "<>", in
> which case it's perfectly valid for the search for conflicts to not find
> itself.

> This patch simply removes that sanity check, and leaves a comment in
> place.

Applied (for 9.1 only).
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: SHOW TABLES
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: SHOW TABLES