On 2020/03/09 13:49, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Sat, 7 Mar 2020 01:46:16 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in
>>> (It seems retroverting to the first patch when I started this...)
>>> The second place covers wider cases so I reverted the first place.
>>
>> Thanks for updating the patch that way.
>> Not sure which patch you're mentioning, though.
>
> That meant 0003.
>
>> Regarding 0003 patch, I added a bit more detail comments into
>> the patch so that we can understand the code more easily.
>> Updated version of 0003 patch attached. Barring any objection,
>> at first, I plan to commit this patch.
>
> Looks good to me. Thanks for writing the detailed comments.
Thanks for the review! Pushed.
I will review other two patches later.
>> There seems to be more other places where XLogSource and
>> XLOG_FROM_XXX are not used yet. For example, the initial values
>> of readSource and XLogReceiptSource, the type of argument
>> "source" in XLogFileReadAnyTLI() and XLogFileRead(), etc.
>> These also should be updated?
>
> Right. I checked through the file and AFAICS that's all. The attachec
> v5-0001-Tidy...patch is the fix on top of the v4-0003 on the current
> master.
Thanks for the patch!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters
