Re: Wrong plan sequential scan instead of an index one - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Wrong plan sequential scan instead of an index one
Date
Msg-id 20399.1175271180@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Wrong plan sequential scan instead of an index one  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Responses Re: Wrong plan sequential scan instead of an index one [8.2 solved it]
List pgsql-performance
Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes:
> Ah, but it's got no way of knowing what matches you'll get for
> '%anything%'. There's no easy way to get statistics for matching substrings.

8.2 actually tries the match on the most-common-values list, if said
list is big enough (I think the threshold is stats target = 100).
Not sure if that will help here, though.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Dutcher"
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird performance drop
Next
From: Erik Jones
Date:
Subject: Re: Shared buffers, db transactions commited, and write IO on Solaris