Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... Or we could
>> import the rather ad-hoc shell-wildcard-like rules used by psql's \d
>> stuff. None of these are especially attractive :-(
> 1. regexes, please.
One argument that occurs to me for importing the psql code is that it's
solved the problem of including a schema name in the pattern. It would
be a lot nicer to say "-t schema.table" than to have to say "-t table -n
schema". In particular this allows one to dump s1.foo and s2.bar
without also getting s1.bar and s2.foo; a problem that is insoluble if
we have only independent schema and table filters. I think that ideally
one would only use the schema switches if one actually wanted a
schema-by-schema dump, not as a wart on the side of the
specific-object-selection switches.
The psql code does allow you to get at most of the functionality of
regexes...
regards, tom lane
