Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If there's more needed here, let's see an official API change,
>> not a hack.
> Well, I guess the obvious API would be something like:
> PGAsyncStatusType PQasyncStatus(const PGconn *conn);
That would mean exposing PGAsyncStatusType, which doesn't seem like an
amazingly good idea either. What is it that the patch actually wants
to do?
regards, tom lane
