Hi,
I have searched solution to my problem a few days. On my query, there is big performance problem.
It seems to me, that problem is on where-part of sql and it's function.
My sql is:
select count(*)
from table_h
where
level <= get_level_value(11268,id,area) and
(date1 >= '2011-1-1' or date2>='2011-1-1') and
(date1 <= '2012-07-09' or date2<='2012-07-09')
This takes about 40sek.
select count(*)
from table_h
where
(date1 >= '2011-1-1' or date2>='2011-1-1') and
(date1 <= '2012-07-09' or date2<='2012-07-09')
when ignoring function, it takes <1sek.
Function is:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION get_level_value(_user integer, _id, _area) RETURNS integer
AS $$
DECLARE found integer;
BEGIN
SELECT 1 INTO found
FROM table_o
WHERE userid=_user AND
id=_id AND
area=_area;
IF (found) THEN
return 3;
ELSE
return 1;
END IF;
END;
$$
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
On explain, it seems to me that this function is on filter and it will execute on every row. Total resultset contains 1
700000 rows.
QUERY PLAN
Aggregate (cost=285543.89..285543.90 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=32391.380..32391.380 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on table_h (cost=11017.63..284987.40 rows=222596 width=0) (actual time=326.946..31857.145
rows=631818loops=1)
Recheck Cond: ((date1 >= '2011-01-01'::date) OR (date2 >= '2011-01-01'::date))
Filter: (((date1 <= '2012-07-09'::date) OR (date2 <= '2012-07-09'::date)) AND (level <= get_level_value(11268,
id,area)))
-> BitmapOr (cost=11017.63..11017.63 rows=669412 width=0) (actual time=321.635..321.635 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on date1 (cost=0.00..10626.30 rows=652457 width=0) (actual time=84.555..84.555
rows=647870loops=1)
Index Cond: (date1 >= '2011-01-01'::date)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on date2_table_h (cost=0.00..280.03 rows=16955 width=0) (actual
time=237.074..237.074rows=15222 loops=1)
Index Cond: (date2 >= '2011-01-01'::date)
How should I handle this situation and use function?
--
kupen
--
Wippies-vallankumous on täällä! Varmista paikkasi vallankumouksen eturintamassa ja liity Wippiesiin heti!
http://www.wippies.com/
