John Naylor <john.naylor@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 5:31 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The length macro was readily available there so I used it. AFAIR
>> that wasn't true elsewhere, though I might've missed something.
>> It's pretty much just belt-and-suspenders coding anyway, since all
>> those arrays are machine generated ...
> I tried using the available num_keywords macro in plpgsql and it
> worked fine, but it makes the lines really long. Alternatively, as in
> the attached, we could remove the single use of the core macro and
> maybe add comments to the generated magic numbers.
Meh, I'm not excited about removing the option just because there's
only one use of it now. There might be more-compelling uses later.
regards, tom lane
