Re: enable_resultcache confusion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: enable_resultcache confusion
Date
Msg-id 2034428.1625767212@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: enable_resultcache confusion  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: enable_resultcache confusion  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Re: enable_resultcache confusion  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> "enable_nodememoization" would work for me

That seems pretty unreadable.  Maybe just "enable_memoization"?

Really if we're going to do something here, we can't merely mess
with the GUC name.  David had expressed a willingness to rename
everything about ResultCache some time ago, but nobody stepped up
with a better name.

Maybe name the plan node type Memoize, and the GUC "enable_memoize"?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: enable_resultcache confusion
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: enable_resultcache confusion