Re: Catversion bumps during beta (was Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: Catversion bumps during beta (was Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring)
Date
Msg-id 20260922173506.dd.noahmisch@microsoft.com
Whole thread
In response to Catversion bumps during beta (was Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 07:01:14PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I don't really mind catversion bumps during the beta period in general, I'm
> in the camp that if there's a change that would make the release better and
> it's not particularly risky, it's better to still sneak it in.
> 
> I feel I might be in the minority with that view though. Historically, we've
> avoided fixes that need catversion bumps late in the beta period, so that
> beta-testers don't need to pg_upgrade. I think that's a poor tradeoff, but
> if we're changing long-standing policy, the RMT probably isn't the right
> group for that. So, how do others feel?

I personally make no attempt to avoid late catversion bumps.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nisha Moond
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Becoming a committer: form for tracking readiness