Hi Henson,
> As things stand, neither shape is giving a wrong answer. They just
> take longer than they need to. That is an optimization we have not
> done rather than a defect, and the current series is about defects, so
> I would rather push the fix down the list.
>
> What do you think?
I agree. IMO stabilizing our code is the first priority. We can
tackle the optimization later (probably after the first version of
RPR gets committed).
Also I think we should add this to the RPR restriction list to be
fair for those who are willing to evaluate/review RPR patches.
- Pushing down a run condition is disabled if DEFINE clause exists.
- Replacing frame options by support functions is disabled if DEFINE
clause exists.
Regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
