Re: Handle concurrent drop when doing whole database vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hello,

At Wed, 1 Jul 2026 08:35:12 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in 
> > 3. The Assert that Bharath suggested earlier doesn't apply as-is but can be
> > incorporated into the patch as:
> > Assert(missing_ok || CheckRelationOidLockedByMe(relid, AccessShareLock,
> > true));
> 
> This fail-safe would be a welcome addition, yes.  Perhaps Nathan feels
> differently, which would be also fine by me.

To me, this Assert seems worthwhile as part of the function's contract.

Regards,

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center