Thank you for the new version.
At Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:47:27 -0500, Baji Shaik <baji.pgdev@gmail.com> wrote in
> I prefer keeping them as 3 patches since each addresses a distinct
> failure mode and is easier to review/bisect independently. That said,
> since 0002 and 0003 now share the same errdetail and are logically
> the same validation (timestamp outside valid range), I'm happy to
> merge them into one patch for v4 if preferred.
Personally, I still feel that providing the UUIDv7 timestamp domain in
an errdetail is a bit excessive. Even for infinity, I tend to think of
the issue as simply being outside the representable range, so I'm not
sure that a separate message is necessary.
That said, this feels like a matter of taste, so it would probably be
useful to hear other opinions.
Regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
