Hello,
At Thu, 25 Jun 2026 17:54:46 +0300, Daria Shanina <vilensipkdm@gmail.com> wrote in
> Hi all,
>
> I found an error: on 32bit system (I tested on Debian 6.1.0-32-686-pae #1
> SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.129-1 (2025-03-06) i686 GNU/Linux) when we
> set huge_page_size = 1 TB postgres process fails with signal SIGFPE when
> calculated hugepagesize_local = (Size) huge_page_size * 1024; the value
> exceeds max for unsigned int = (2^32 – 1).
> I attached a full backtrace and one small fix.
Good catch.
> What do you think about this?
> Thank you for your attention!
This would avoid the SIGFPE, but I wonder whether this should be
rejected earlier in check_huge_page_size() instead, with an error
like:
> "huge_page_size" is too large for this platform.
We could also make the later calculation use a wider integer type, but
such a value would not be usable anyway on a platform where it does
not fit in Size. So it seems better to reject it earlier in
check_huge_page_size(), before reaching CreateAnonymousSegment().
Regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
