Hello,
At Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:44:23 +0800, Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote in
> While testing “[d7965d65f] Add rudimentary table prioritization to autovacuum”, I noticed a small doc issue.
>
> In monitoring.sgml, it states:
> ```
> <row>
> <entry role="catalog_table_entry"><para role="column_definition">
> <structfield>vacuum_score</structfield> <type>double precision</type>
> </para>
> <para>
> Vacuum component score. Scores greater than or equal to
> <xref linkend="guc-autovacuum-vacuum-score-weight"/> indicate that
> autovacuum would vacuum the table (unless autovacuum is disabled).
> </para></entry>
> </row>
> ```
If I understand this correctly, aren't the *_score_weight settings
used to prioritize candidate tables, rather than to determine whether
a table needs vacuuming or analyzing in the first place?
Regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
