Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?
Date
Msg-id 20260403.090640.487260902102768591.ishii@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we still need MULE_INTERNAL?  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Thomas,

It seems there's remaining "Mule internal" in
doc/src/sgml/charset.sgml in your patch.

  <para>
   The character set support in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
   allows you to store text in a variety of character sets (also called
   encodings), including
   single-byte character sets such as the ISO 8859 series and
   multiple-byte character sets such as <acronym>EUC</acronym> (Extended Unix
   Code), UTF-8, and Mule internal code.  All supported character sets
                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~             

Regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: surya poondla
Date:
Subject: Re: heapam_tuple_complete_speculative : remove unnecessary tuple fetch
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_waldump: support decoding of WAL inside tarfile