Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro?
Date
Msg-id 202604011144.jeo56tazdx6z@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro?  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro?
Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro?
List pgsql-hackers
On 2026-Apr-01, Peter Smith wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> As originally reported [1] in the EXCEPT (TABLE ...) thread, I felt
> the _() gettext macro is mis-used when it contains nothing but a
> quoted format string.

No, you feel wrong -- this is necessary so that the translator has
control over the quoting style of a list of items.  Not all translations
use double quoting.  Some examples from different language files:

msgstr "unbekannte Komprimierungsoption: »%s«"
msgstr "opción de compresión no reconocida: «%s»"
msgstr "option de compression inconnue : « %s »"
msgstr "tidak dapat menentukan encoding untuk lokal « %s » : codesetnya adalah « %s »"

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"In fact, the basic problem with Perl 5's subroutines is that they're not
crufty enough, so the cruft leaks out into user-defined code instead, by
the Conservation of Cruft Principle."  (Larry Wall, Apocalypse 6)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: vectorized CRC on ARM64
Next
From: Junwang Zhao
Date:
Subject: Re: Eliminating SPI / SQL from some RI triggers - take 3