Re: [PATCH] Add support for INSERT ... SET syntax - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCH] Add support for INSERT ... SET syntax
Date
Msg-id 202603301544.utwvuj534m36@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Add support for INSERT ... SET syntax  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Add support for INSERT ... SET syntax
Re: [PATCH] Add support for INSERT ... SET syntax
List pgsql-hackers
On 2026-Mar-30, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Well, Suraj has kinda beaten me to it, but he didn't invent this syntax.
> Oracle did <https://oracle-base.com/articles/23/non-positional-insert-into-set-and-insert-into-by-name-clauses-23>
> and I believe there is a proposal to add it to the standard. (Unlike
> Suraj's, my WIP patch also supports the INSERT BY NAME variant.)

Hmm, I don't see any WIP patch from you -- are you talking about this
patch from July 2019?
https://postgr.es/m/CA+A-St+NntBh2EGu3a0xbVxJFzaeEOn=Vn_V84OuhM59_HKarQ@mail.gmail.com

Funnily enough, we have an even older proposal from 2016,
https://postgr.es/m/709e06c0-59c9-ccec-d216-21e38cb5ed61@joh.to

It seems this is quite a popular missing feature, as Marko's patch was
also asked about in February 2019:
https://postgr.es/m/e58dd487-7ed4-3f95-c63c-24200ed768be@berkvens.net

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding locks statistics