On Thu, 26 Mar 2026 10:31:19 +0900
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 10:18:39AM +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > I'm not sure this would significantly reduce the size of
> > PgStat_StatTabEntry. Could you elaborate on the expected benefits?
>
> The point is that this reduces the shmem footprint for indexes (well,
> it's also benefitial for tables, just less), on top of being cleaner
> because the stats views would only need to store and query the fields
> they care about for each relkind.
Thank you for the clarification. I think I understand your point now.
So, you mean introducing a separate stats kind for indexes, such as
PGSTAT_KIND_INDEX?
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
> --
> Michael
--
Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
