Re: remove bits* types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: remove bits* types
Date
Msg-id 202603190933.p2q62lss4xbk@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: remove bits* types  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: remove bits* types
List pgsql-hackers
On 2026-Mar-18, Robert Haas wrote:

> I'm not entirely sure that this is worth standardizing at all; if
> someone thinks that using bits8 or whatever makes the code more rather
> than less clear in a certain context, who am I to argue? If someone
> else prefers uint8 in another context, also fine.

I don't think we _have_ to force our hand one way or the other.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"It takes less than 2 seconds to get to 78% complete; that's a good sign.
A few seconds later it's at 90%, but it seems to have stuck there.  Did
somebody make percentages logarithmic while I wasn't looking?"
                http://smylers.hates-software.com/2005/09/08/1995c749.html



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Xuneng Zhou
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG: Cascading standby fails to reconnect after falling back to archive recovery
Next
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: Serverside SNI support in libpq