On 2026-Feb-27, Fujii Masao wrote:
> I'm fine with this direction, but I think it should be handled as a separate
> improvement to the \d meta-commands, rather than as part of the current patch
> extending \dRp+, \dRs+, and \dX+.
> I'm thinking to first commit the v3 patch so that comments on publications,
> subscriptions, and extended statistics can be viewed via \d. After that,
> we can consider a broader overhaul of the \d commands and how comments are
> displayed, as discussed.
No objection to that.
Do you intend to work on that yourself, or should we seek volunteers?
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
