On 2026-Feb-22, Michael Paquier wrote:
> While I get the feeling of urgency, I am wondering if this particular
> fix should have been delayed and pushed for next May's release. We
> are already doing one quick release for the regressions found in the
> CVE fixes..
I debated that with myself before pushing. I thought the risk of
introducing a new bug or problem was pretty low; whereas the bug was
clearly already affecting real-world users in their attempts to migrate
to 18 from earlier versions, so the damage was real.
> Based on my read of the fix, I feel rather safe that this is OK. But
> as I have quoted upthread, the reason why I did not reply yet was to
> wait for next week's release to be out before acting. That's your
> code of course, so no objections from here, just a slight doubt about
> the timing.
Hmm, what? The only response from you that I see in this thread is
https://postgr.es/m/aYp9tTWjUqS1ffAd@paquier.xyz
which was on Feb 10th, which is before the 18.2 release, so you couldn't
have been considering the 18.3 release yet.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"On the other flipper, one wrong move and we're Fatal Exceptions"
(T.U.X.: Term Unit X - http://www.thelinuxreview.com/TUX/)
