On 2026-Feb-05, Chao Li wrote:
> Exactly. In this case, memory leaking is not a problem at all. My
> thinking was that once we do decide to free the top-level object, it
> feels more consistent and less surprising to also free what it owns,
> even if the lifetime is effectively the whole process. It’s less about
> resource pressure and more about keeping the ownership model clear for
> future readers and maintenance.
Maybe we should just change the "pg_free(state)" to "/* no point freeing
memory */" or something like that.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"We're here to devour each other alive" (Hobbes)
