Re: pg_restore dependencies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_restore dependencies
Date
Msg-id 2026.1239400771@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore dependencies  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_restore dependencies  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Doesn't that eliminate any chance of running two CREATE INDEXes
>> concurrently on the same table?

> No, since neither of them will have any locking dependencies, which are 
> only for items that take an exclusive lock on the table(s), such as FK 
> constraints.

In that case a CREATE INDEX would also fail to be seen as conflicting
with an ALTER ADD FOREIGN KEY, which I thought was the nub of Josh's
complaint.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Unicode string literals versus the world
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore dependencies