On Wed, 31 Dec 2025 11:36:56 +0800
Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 30, 2025, at 18:01, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The attached patch is a trivial change to fix the comments on
> > _bt_skiparray_strat_increment() and _bt_skiparray_strat_decrement() so
> > that they are consistent with the comments on _bt_skiparray_strat_adjust().
> > At least the comment on _bt_skiparray_strat_decrement() containts an
> > obvious typo, since it mentions converting the high_compare key instead of
> > the low_compare key.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yugo Nagata
> >
> > --
> > Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
> > <fix_comments_on_bt_skiparray_strat_dec_inc_func.patch>
>
> Good catch. Looks like a copy/paste mistake.
>
> The code snippet prove the 2 functions' header comments are wrong:
Thank you for your reviewing.
> I also think we can delete “a” from the header comments. “into a >= key”, where “a” is an article (meaning one), but
canbe easily read as a variable name. The code comments don’t use “a” after “into”.
The existing comments are grammatically correct, but as you point out,
removing the "a" might make them less confusing. However, the comments in
_bt_skiparray_strat_adjust() and in _bt_preprocess_array_keys_final(), which
call this function, also use "a" after "into".
If we remove the "a" here, should we also update those comments for consistency?
--
Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
