Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Date
Msg-id 202512110804.hmukvd7jna34@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2025-Dec-11, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> That's a great question and I've been wondering about it myself. It goes all
> the way to the initial commit where multixacts were introduced, and I don't
> see any particular reason for it even back then. Even in the very first
> version of multixact.c, IMO it would've been simpler to have the writer
> handle the wraparound.
> 
> Álvaro, would you happen to remember?

Sorry, I have no recollections of the reason why it was done this way.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Voy a acabar con todos los humanos / con los humanos yo acabaré
voy a acabar con todos (bis) / con todos los humanos acabaré ¡acabaré! (Bender)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: DOCS - Clarify the publication 'publish_via_partition_root' default value.