On 2025-Oct-06, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> While quickly checking this commit, it seems the problem is that
> before this commit we had a simple logic to add an additional ALTER
> TABLE to SET NULL, if the attribute has a not null constraint but the
> the parent from which it is inherited doesn't have not null constraint
> [1]. Whereas after this commit, it seems we removed this ALTER
> command and tried to add the not null constraint while creating the
> inherited table itself, which is fine. But here the logic to identify
> whether the constraint is local or not for v17 is not correct [2], it
> sets "notnull_islocal", only if the "attislocal" is true, which seems
> to be wrong. Because the test case given in this bug the attribute is
> not local but it is marked not null.
Ah, right, the column is indeed not local, but the constraint is. I
think this means we need to use flagInhAttrs to require the constraint
to be printed ... looking.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/