Re: BUG #19074: pg_dump from v18 loses the NOT NULL flag in the inherited table field when dumping v17-databases - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: BUG #19074: pg_dump from v18 loses the NOT NULL flag in the inherited table field when dumping v17-databases
Date
Msg-id 202510061043.hjzm5ixk5tfs@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #19074: pg_dump from v18 loses the NOT NULL flag in the inherited table field when dumping v17-databases  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #19074: pg_dump from v18 loses the NOT NULL flag in the inherited table field when dumping v17-databases
List pgsql-bugs
On 2025-Oct-06, Dilip Kumar wrote:

> While quickly checking this commit, it seems the problem is that
> before this commit we had a simple logic to add an additional ALTER
> TABLE to SET NULL, if the attribute has a not null constraint but the
> the parent from which it is inherited doesn't have not null constraint
> [1].  Whereas after this commit, it seems we removed this ALTER
> command and tried to add the not null constraint while creating the
> inherited table itself, which is fine.  But here the logic to identify
> whether the constraint is local or not for v17 is not correct [2], it
> sets "notnull_islocal", only if the "attislocal" is true, which seems
> to be wrong.  Because the test case given in this bug the attribute is
> not local but it is marked not null.

Ah, right, the column is indeed not local, but the constraint is.  I
think this means we need to use flagInhAttrs to require the constraint
to be printed ... looking.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Marco Boeringa
Date:
Subject: Re: Potential "AIO / io workers" inter-worker locking issue in PG18?
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #11500: PRIMARY KEY index not being used