Re: Raw parse tree is not dumped to log - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: Raw parse tree is not dumped to log
Date
Msg-id 20250905.190638.2116173459262722933.ishii@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raw parse tree is not dumped to log  (Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Raw parse tree is not dumped to log
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> Hi Tatsuo san,
> 
> I just rebased the commit for the GUC change.
> 
> On Sep 3, 2025, at 09:57, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote:
> 
> That's 0.3% difference, definitely noise-level. Ok, I withdraw my
> claim and commit the patch without unlikely().
> 
> I also removed unlikely() in v7.

v7 patch looks good to me. BTW, how do you want to be credited in the
commit message?

Author: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Author: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>

It seems your email is the latter, however you wrote the former in
your patch.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove traces of long in dynahash.c
Next
From: Oreo Yang
Date:
Subject: 回复: Differential Code Coverage report for Postgres