Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD
Date
Msg-id 202505261340.jdte5xxj4jc2@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to [MASSMAIL]Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD
List pgsql-hackers
Hi

I updated our coverage building server from bullseye to bookworm today.
That got us from lcov 1.14 to ... 1.16.  Disappointing!  But lcov 2.0,
with support for differential report, is just around the corner, so I
thought I could spend some time figuring out how to make it generate
those reports.  Could you share the scripts you used to create these
reports?

Incidentally, the reports you posted last
https://anarazel.de/postgres/cov/16-vs-HEAD-2024-04-14/src/index-bin_date.html#B0
seem to have lost files?  Clicking around I get a bunch of 404s.

Thanks!

-- 
Álvaro Herrera        Breisgau, Deutschland  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Industry suffers from the managerial dogma that for the sake of stability
and continuity, the company should be independent of the competence of
individual employees."                                      (E. Dijkstra)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Anas-ur-Rasheed Khan
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature Suggestion: Make synchronous_commit a table level property
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: pg18: Virtual generated columns are not (yet) safe when superuser selects from them