On 2025-May-08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Seems worth doing to simplify the code in the long-run, even if these
> require a case-by-case manual lookup.
Yeah, I don't think we can take a patch that simply removes everything
that this report mentions, because some of the includes (especially the
system includes) could be platform-dependent. Also I imagine some of
them depend on compile-time environment -- e.g., I'm pretty sure
src/port/pg_popcount_aarch64.c is not going to work well without
pg_bitutils.h.
> All that is potential work for v19, of course.
Yep.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Update: super-fast reaction on the Postgres bugs mailing list. The report
was acknowledged [...], and a fix is under discussion.
The wonders of open-source !"
https://twitter.com/gunnarmorling/status/1596080409259003906
