Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements
Date
Msg-id 202502050846.o5agxnt3cyoo@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements  (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2025-Feb-04, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:

> To be clear: the only stats column currently in the staging
> environment shows exactly this. Changes 4 and 5 are *not* visible in
> columns on the commitfest page, that info is currently only visible on
> the patch details page. (For context for others: during the FOSDEM
> meeting 4 was a column on the commitfest page, but I reverted that
> after the feedback there)
> 
> So, I guess clutter wise the current staging is acceptable to you.

Check.

> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 17:27, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:

> > 2. a per-patch breakdown of the number of addition and deletions for the
> >    last patchset version posted, one line per patch.  This would appear
> >    in a tooltip on the column for the totals, to avoid interface
> >    clutter.
> 
> Statistics for each patch would definitely be nice. Not trivial to add
> though, because it would need cfbot to get those statistics for each
> patch. I created a github issue for this idea to track it[1]

Understood, thanks.

> > > 10. Allow sorting patches by total additions/deletions (added together
> > > for total lines changed)
> >
> > Seems reasonable, though I don't see much of an use-case for this.
> 
> My main idea behind this is to allow people to easily find some small
> patchsets, for when they have ~30 minutes to review something. Or for
> new contributors to find something to review without getting
> overwhelmed.

Ah, okay, sounds good.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation