Re: Drop back the redundant "Lock" suffix from LWLock wait event names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Drop back the redundant "Lock" suffix from LWLock wait event names
Date
Msg-id 202412021322.s6b2objq26mv@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Drop back the redundant "Lock" suffix from LWLock wait event names
List pgsql-hackers
On 2024-Dec-02, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:

> Hi hackers,
> 
> da952b415f unintentionally added back the "Lock" suffix into the LWLock wait
> event names:
> 
> - "added back" because the "Lock" suffix was removed in 14a9101091
> - "unintentionally" because there is nothing in the thread [2] that explicitly
> mentions that the idea was also to revert 14a9101091

Oh, you're right, this was unintentional and unnoticed.  I'll push this
shortly, to both 17 and master.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kirill Reshke
Date:
Subject: Re: Using read stream in autoprewarm
Next
From: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Using read stream in autoprewarm