Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Dolgov
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
Date
Msg-id 20240811193455.ctafhzgw25iiqgkb@erthalion.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions  (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
List pgsql-hackers
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 07:54:05PM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
>
> This feature will improve my monitoring. Even in patch 0001. I think there are many other people in the thread who
thinkthis is useful. So maybe we should move it forward? Any complaints about the overall design? I see in the
discussionit was mentioned that it would be good to measure performance difference.
 
>
> PS: patch cannot be applied at this time, it needs another rebase.

Yeah, it seems like most people are fine with the first patch and the
simplest approach. I'm going to post a rebased version and a short
thread summary soon.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sergei Kornilov
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoiding superfluous buffer locking during nbtree backwards scans