Re: documentation structure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: documentation structure
Date
Msg-id 20240720.094717.1695122772235543142.ishii@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: documentation structure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: documentation structure
List pgsql-hackers
>> IMO the file name should match the ID of the sect1 element with the leading
>> "functions-" removed, naming the directory "functions".  Thus when viewing
>> the web page the corresponding sgml file is determinable.
> 
> I'd go for shorter myself (ie "func/"), mainly due to the precedent
> of the existing subdirectory which is "ref/" not "reference/".
> It's hardly a big deal though.

I don't have strong preference neither but I agree that "func/" is
more consistent with existing subdirectory names.

Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS LLC
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Paul George
Date:
Subject: Re: behavior of GROUP BY with VOLATILE expressions
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: documentation structure