Hi,
On 2024-05-15 11:14:14 +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2024-May-15, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
>
> > It looks like with the use of the new multi insert table access method
> > (TAM) for COPY (v20-0005), pgbench regressed about 35% [1].
>
> Where does this acronym "TAM" comes from for "table access method"? I
> find it thoroughly horrible and wish we didn't use it. What's wrong
> with using "table AM"? It's not that much longer, much clearer and
> reuses our well-established acronym AM.
Strongly agreed. I don't know why I dislike TAM so much though.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
