Home > mailing lists

Re: ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA versus dependent types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	Nathan Bossart
Subject	Re: ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA versus dependent types
Date	May 9 03:01:16
Msg-id	20240509000116.GB3212918@nathanxps13 Whole thread Raw
In response to	Re: ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA versus dependent types (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List	pgsql-hackers

Tree view

On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 07:57:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
>> Agreed.  Another option could be to just annotate the arguments with the
>> parameter names.
> 
> At the call sites you mean?  Sure, I can do that.

Yes.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Tom Lane
Date: 09 May, 02:57:55
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA versus dependent types

From: Michael Paquier
Date: 09 May, 03:03:56
Subject: Re: add --no-sync to pg_upgrade's calls to pg_dump and pg_dumpall

Re: ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA versus dependent types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Previous

Next