On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 12:57:18PM +0000, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
>> That's true, but using a hard-coded limit means we no longer need to add a
>> new GUC. Always allocating, say, 256 slots might require a few additional
>> kilobytes of shared memory, most of which will go unused, but that seems
>> unlikely to be a problem for the systems that will run Postgres v18.
>
> I agree with this.
Here's what this might look like. I chose an upper limit of 1024, which
seems like it "ought to be enough for anybody," at least for now.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
