Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects
Date
Msg-id 20240424210839.GA863220@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:47:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> On the whole I find this proposed feature pretty unexciting
> and dubiously worthy of the implementation/maintenance effort.

I don't have any particularly strong feelings on $SUBJECT, but I'll admit
I'd be much more interested in resolving any remaining reasons folks are
using large objects over TOAST.  I see a couple of reasons listed in the
docs [0] that might be worth examining.

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/lo-intro.html

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness