Hi,
On 2024-04-18 09:07:43 -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> On 18/04/2024 00:39, Andres Freund wrote:
> >There are lots of places that could benefit from adding 'static
> >const'.
>
> I found a few more places.
Good catches.
> Patch 004
>
> The opposite would also help, adding static.
> In these places, I believe it is safe to add static,
> allowing the compiler to transform into read-only, definitively.
I don't think this would even compile? E.g. LockTagTypeNames, pg_wchar_table
are declared in a header and used across translation units.
Greetings,
Andres Freund