Hi,
On 2024-04-15 19:14:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think the right answer is to
> back-patch Michael's 65c5864d7 (xml2: Replace deprecated routines with
> recommended ones). We speculated about that at the time (see e.g.,
> 400928b83) but didn't pull the trigger. I think 65c5864d7 has now
> baked long enough that it'd be safe to back-patch.
Looks like a reasonable plan to me.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
