Re: NLS doesn't work for pg_combinebackup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: NLS doesn't work for pg_combinebackup
Date
Msg-id 20240408.163105.2037545760162246773.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [MASSMAIL]NLS doesn't work for pg_combinebackup  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: NLS doesn't work for pg_combinebackup
List pgsql-hackers
At Mon, 08 Apr 2024 16:27:02 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in 
> Hello.
> 
> I noticed that NLS doesn't work for pg_combinebackup. The cause is
> that the tool forgets to call set_pglocale_pgservice().
> 
> This issue is fixed by the following chage.
> 
> diff --git a/src/bin/pg_combinebackup/pg_combinebackup.c b/src/bin/pg_combinebackup/pg_combinebackup.c
> index 1b07ca3fb6..2788c78fdd 100644
> --- a/src/bin/pg_combinebackup/pg_combinebackup.c
> +++ b/src/bin/pg_combinebackup/pg_combinebackup.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  
>      pg_logging_init(argv[0]);
>      progname = get_progname(argv[0]);
> +    set_pglocale_pgservice(argv[0], PG_TEXTDOMAIN("pg_combinebackup"));
>      handle_help_version_opts(argc, argv, progname, help);
>  
>      memset(&opt, 0, sizeof(opt));

Forgot to mention, but pg_walsummary has the same issue.

diff --git a/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c b/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c
index 5e41b376d7..daf6cd14ce 100644
--- a/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c
+++ b/src/bin/pg_walsummary/pg_walsummary.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
     pg_logging_init(argv[0]);
     progname = get_progname(argv[0]);
+    set_pglocale_pgservice(argv[0], PG_TEXTDOMAIN("pg_walsummary"));
     handle_help_version_opts(argc, argv, progname, help);
 
     /* process command-line options */


regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: [MASSMAIL]NLS doesn't work for pg_combinebackup
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird test mixup