Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
Date
Msg-id 20240327150826.GB3994937@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:54:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> writes:
>> What is the status of this? In the commitfest, this patch is marked as
>> "Needs Review" with Nathan as reviewer - Nathan, were you going to take
>> another look at this or was your mail from January 12th a full review?
> 
> In my mind the ball is in Nathan's court.  I feel it's about
> committable, but he might not agree.

I'll prioritize another round of review on this one.  FWIW I don't remember
having any major concerns on a previous version of the patch set I looked
at.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`