Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Date
Msg-id 20240325195443.GA2923888@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
List pgsql-hackers
I apologize that I haven't been able to keep up with this thread for a
while, but I'm happy to see the continued interest in $SUBJECT.

On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 03:05:44PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> This commit particularly lets one specify the inactive_timeout for
> a slot via SQL functions pg_create_physical_replication_slot and
> pg_create_logical_replication_slot.

Off-list, Bharath brought to my attention that the current proposal was to
set the timeout at the slot level.  While I think that is an entirely
reasonable thing to support, the main use-case I have in mind for this
feature is for an administrator that wants to prevent inactive slots from
causing problems (e.g., transaction ID wraparound) on a server or a number
of servers.  For that use-case, I think a GUC would be much more
convenient.  Perhaps there could be a default inactive slot timeout GUC
that would be used in the absence of a slot-level setting.  Thoughts?

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Combine Prune and Freeze records emitted by vacuum
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts