On 2024-Mar-14, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 20:08, Jacob Champion
> <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > I hit this on my machine. With the attached diff I can reproduce
> > constantly (including with the most recent test patch); I think the
> > cancel must be arriving between the bind/execute steps?
>
> Nice find! Your explanation makes total sense. Attached a patchset
> that fixes/works around this issue by using the simple query protocol
> in the cancel test.
Hmm, isn't this basically saying that we're giving up on reliably
canceling queries altogether? I mean, maybe we'd like to instead fix
the bug about canceling queries in extended query protocol ...
Isn't that something you're worried about?
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"World domination is proceeding according to plan" (Andrew Morton)
